January 29, 2003

Lies and Hypocrisy delivered with sincerity and a moist eye

I bit my tongue and watched the whole State of the Union address. Lies and hypocrisy delivered with utmost sincerity and even a moist eye at times.

From the concern about our pocket books and the economy (let's advance those tax cuts) where in a "Family of 4 earning $40,000" would pay only "$45" a year in federal taxes. While that seems wonderful (I guess) how are we going to fund the war-without-end and ever get out of the trillion plus dollars of debt on $45 a year? Who pray tell makes up the difference? The corporations? Not bloody likely. Which means that something stinks here.

I bit my tongue and watched the whole State of the Union address. Lies and hypocrisy delivered with utmost sincerity and even a moist eye at times.

From the concern about our pocket books and the economy (let's advance those tax cuts) wherein a "family of 4 earning $40,000" would pay only "$45" a year in federal taxes. While that seems wonderful (I guess) how are we going to fund the war-without-end and ever get out of the trillion plus dollars of debt on $45 a year? Who pray tell makes up the difference? The corporations? Not bloody likely. Which means that something stinks here.

The we have those folks on Medicaid who need prescription drug cost relief... no problem ... it's important ... just give up your Medicaid benefits and join an HMO. Stinks of the 'P' word to me (privatization). Of course, we won't mention that HMOs are cutting off serving the elderly (or pricing them out of coverage) almost as fast as Cheney can disappear down his rabbit hole.

And OF COURSE President Bush cares about the environment (that's why he is letting energy producers NOT deal with "costly" pollution control requirements, why he is leasing our protected federal lands to oil companies, why he is saving us from forest fires by getting rid of those pesky trees, why he wants to drill in the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge, and why he is wants to give businesses who buy SUVs a 75% tax write-off on the cost). So he wants to give 1.5 BILLION to automakers to come up with a hydrogen fuel car (of course they won't give the money back if they never put one in production). And TECHNOLOGY and INNOVATION are going to save us from global warming - we have thought that over and over again.

Ah yes, then the news we were all waiting to hear -- war and terrorism. North Korea - watch out! We will not be blackmailed by nuclear threat (we are building the Stars Wars missile defense shield after all). And Iran, look out - we hear the voices of the cry for freedom - and you have weapons of mass destruction AND connections to terrorist organizations.

But we wanted to hear about Iraq and did we ever.
NOTE italicized portions are my comments.

QUOTE: "Year after year, Saddam Hussein has gone to elaborate lengths, spent enormous sums, taken great risks to build and keep weapons of mass destruction. But why? The only possible explanation, the only possible use he could have for those weapons, is to dominate, intimidate, or attack."

And of course WE have the most weapons of mass destruction to ... make us feel safe at night?

QUOTE: "The dictator who is assembling the world's most dangerous weapons has already used them on whole villages -- leaving thousands of his own citizens dead, blind, or disfigured."

Of course we won't mention that we helped supply Hussein with those WMDs, nor say ONE WORD while he used them on Iran or on the Kurds.

QUOTE: "Iraqi refugees tell us how forced confessions are obtained -- by torturing children while their parents are made to watch. International human rights groups have catalogued other methods used in the torture chambers of Iraq: electric shock, burning with hot irons, dripping acid on the skin, mutilation with electric drills, cutting out tongues, and rape."

And our training of Latin American dictators, generals, police personnel, in torture and control through School of the Americas run by the US military?

QUOTE: "If this is not evil, then evil has no meaning."

I think we all agree on this one - Hussein is not the only one engaging in "evil".

QUOTE:"And as we and our coalition partners are doing in Afghanistan, we will bring to the Iraqi people food and medicines and supplies -- and freedom."

AFTER we have blocked them with sanctions for 12 years! Is this a bribe?

QUOTE:"America is a strong nation, and honorable in the use of our strength. We exercise power without conquest, and we sacrifice for the liberty of strangers."

As we fought "selflessly" in Panama, Columbia, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Vietnam, Cambodia ..... all the while helping dictators and despots rise to power; engaging in combat only when "our" interests were advanced. Oh please.

And perhaps most frightening of all -
QUOTE: "Americans are a free people, who know that freedom is the right of every person and the future of every nation. The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity."

"WE" apparently are doing "God's"work in expanding this "freedom" to everyone whether they want it (or us) or not.

Full text of State_of the Union Address

Posted by rowan at January 29, 2003 9:00 PM | [eMail this article!] |
Social Net Options: DIGG this -- del.icio.us -- StumbleUpon
Comments

Last night, as I watched the state of the union address, I also thought about all the lies that Bush was delivering. He really thinks that we are giving these people in the middle east a "gift of freedom" when we(U.S) have in the past participated in so many secretive operations supporting dictatorships across the globe. Saadam is a bad person, but why do we always have to stick our noses in everyone elses business? We really don't need to go to war. We just need to stop being the bully of the world and learn to keep of noses out of everyones business.

Posted by: Gabby at January 29, 2003 9:44 PM

Back in the day when I was active in Theatre, I would have called Bush's State of the Union a really lousy audition. It was second rate, like watching a daytime soap: melodramatic, redundant, chalked full of rhetoric and the same old/same old! It made me absolutely incredulous that ANYONE could buy his line of crap! I mean, the "moist eyes" as Rowan pointed out ... it's the oldest trick in the book, was he serious or looking for an Emmy? Why do people trust this man?

Anyway, his references to education (testing,testing, EXPENSIVE standardized testing)--after the budget cuts and pillaging he's done to many key departments at the Federal level--preserving the peace, and adhering to UN law (does ANYONE remember Iran-Contra and his Daddy's core position in that debacle), environmental concerns (His family's record on environmental protection--from Daddy, to Jebb to George W. is nothing but deplorable), to tax breaks for the middle class (don't forget those stock dividend tax breaks) ... there was nothing that I heard that wasn't hypocracy in its purest form. Each policy he claimed to be committed to has been categorically denied by his record. He must think we are all as foolish (and ill-advised) as he is.

And then all those self-satisfied party members clapping at the close of each and every sentence he uttered, giving him a standing ovation for every other ridiculous assertion, as though they were programmed robots--as if we've never heard it before--these wonderful ideas for restoring the greatness of our country! There was nothing that emerged from his tight-mouthed face that was original (or accurate for that matter) or interesting. It was right-wing regurgitation all the way.

I just can't help but be disgusted. The day after the address a friend excitedly called me and congratulated me for tutoring. She told me I was "doing exactly what the President was talking about in his address, mentoring." I told her that I was tutoring an 11-year old Somalian boy, because the schools have absolutely NO funding to provide this child with even basic one-on-one outside homework help. And God knows, he'd better be prepared to pass his SIM tests. He has one full class period spent daily on SIM-prep. I wonder where Bush thinks the average family, both parents working, shuttling their kids to and from any enriching extra-curricular programs that are no longer funded, are to have this extra time to mentor disadvantaged children who certainly don't live near their advantaged neighborhoods....

But she, and other well-established business people I know, claimed his speech was a "home run."

I want to commend the (D) Senator from Washington for a really thoughtful and well-stated counter-point at the end of the speech. Now that speech had a bit of tooth in it...

The whole address was just a big bucket of swill...and that's all I have to say about that! :-)

Posted by: Pamela at January 31, 2003 11:09 AM

I heard this morning on the news that 8 nations had 'come on board' and sided with the US against Iraq, and that Turkey had only one week to consider the request for US military forces within their borders or else it would be "too late" to get our military settled.

My question is this: Just how much money in economic aid did Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney promise to GIVE to them for their agreement/acquisiton that WE as taxpayers will have to cough up from now until the end of time? This is in addition to the billions of dollars any war will likely cost us, not including the toil our country will suffer in the body count!

I will be joining the Women in Black on Fridays in Downtown Portland.

Posted by: Christine at January 31, 2003 9:35 PM
Crd Lorraine Denicourt