July 22, 2003
If altered foods are so great, why so many problems?
I remember the "good old days" when the bad agricultural news was crop destruction by drought, flood, and pestilence. I still see that from time to time, but increasingly what I see is about crops that are "altered," and the threats that they pose. We are all supposed to be reassured by the US FDA statements that there is "no difference" between GM foods and non-GM foods. Heck, they don't even need to be labeled. And what about those production additons - such as hormones and antibiotics? No problem says the FDA.
But there do seem to be a few problems.
For example, I was a bit surprise by a Bio-security warning over disposal of GE Sheep (GE Free NZ, 7/18/03). It seems testing has shown that cremating the sheep doesn't destroy either their DNA or prions. This is a problem, as many of the GE sheep are having immune system problems and "spongiform" changes. Spongiform changes are changes that make the brain change consistency to a sponge-like quality.
The harbinger news however is Yes, We'll have no Bananas (Alison, Globe & Mail, 7/19/03). It is estimated that within the next ten years that the banana will be extinct. Why? Because it has been tampered with so much that it is now both sterile and seedless.
"But the stage was set for the final act in the story of this beloved yellow fruit in the 1950s. By then, generations of selective breeding had long since inhibited natural banana reproduction, and genetic tinkering had all but obliterated most commercial varieties. Eventually, one morph remained, the Gros Michel variety. All domestic stock was its clone, an exact genetic copy of that one variety. Every tree was equally vulnerable to plant disease, crop pests and climate variables" (Alison)
For those who keep an eye on these things, the news that every banana is a "clone" will sound quite familiar. We are virtually at that point right now with corn in the US. Virtually all of the commercial corn is a clone. Nowhere does long term concerns about bio-diversity arise more clearly than in agriculture. If we have only one variety of crop and there is an environmental disaster (whether that is bugs, climate change, or disease) then all of that species are susceptible. If the crop is global (which is certainly what bio-tech ag companies such as Monsanto hope for) then all of a species could be wiped out globally. Since the bio-tech folks have gone after the most widely used subsistence crops (rice, corn, wheat, barley, peanuts, soybeans, etc.), then those are the ones that are most susceptible - and most catastrophic if lost.
Plant "gene banks" are scattered all over the world to try and recover from such a catastrophe. Unfortunately, all of the plant gene banks in the world provide no solution to the hunger that would result from such a crop loss -- there simply is not enough unmodified seed available. Further, those stocks are also at risk because as modified plants spread and cross pollination and contamination occurs, the indigenous stocks are irreplaceable. Further, if they are reintroduced they are likely to become contaminated by existing modified species. These fears were brought to light in 2001 with reports of the genetic contamination of indigenous crops in remote portions of Oxaca Mexico.
But I digress. Back to the problems of the clone banana. Is this a signal of the beginning of the end? It is certainly dire - even if you don't care for bananas. I don't know of a modern commercial crop that has gone extinct. Bananas are a popular fruit and this has implications beyond humans. What about other species that depend on bananas as a dietary mainstay? My guess is that this is not going to be last commercial crop heading down the road of history.
Obviously, this news and others about GM foods should throw flags all over the place. It should also through some caution into US policy regarding GM products (as we are the largest producer and promoter), but I doubt that it will. Certainly more public pressure needs to be brought to control the experimentation with the global food supply. This is not just a health issue of "what do GM foods do to you," but a threat to the survival of humans and all other species on the planet.
Posted by rowan at July 22, 2003 8:41 AM
|
[eMail this article!] |
Social Net Options: DIGG this --
del.icio.us --
StumbleUpon
Nature's/Wild Oats is a BIG business with big plans. Looking at the various investment rags, rumor has it that there may be a merger in the near future. Kroger (who bought out Fred Meyers) is said to be taking a hard look.
The following is from their Investor FAQ page.
I believe there needs to be a call for social responsibility in Science, Agriculture, the Food Industry and Government Regulatory Agencies that overrides politics and profit.
The conversation about what is being done to our food supply, who is doing it, why it is being done and the consequences of such actions needs to be kept active and visible. I have linked to "If Altered Foods Are So Great, Why So Many Problems?" I hope others will do the same.
Welcome Dalene! I think this needs to be talked about far and wide before it is too late to talk about it because GE will have spread so far that total biosphere contamination is a moot point.
...absolutely agreed - the rest of the world doesn't want 'our' food, we need to join them in the struggle against America's bully-tactics.
And in the meantime - I can recommend New Seasons as an alternative to Wild Oats/Natures - most of their produce is organic, prices are at least comparable if not cheaper - and the staff have proven friendly and helpful in all three stores I've shopped at over the past three years I've lived here! Plus, their organic sesame sunflower sourdough bread rocks! :)
I would also recommend Peopl's Food Co-op 3029 SE 21st Ave.(Portland, Or.) They have good produce and are a cooperative, local endeavor. THey are deserving of your business and your membership. This is also the time of the weekly Wednesday organic farmers market at Peoples. What business do you know that hosts folks to sell what they are selling???
Maybe this idea has already been implemented. With an arrogant administration like BUSHCO., I would not be surprised. You think they would actually tell us about it first? Maybe A wealthy man bet big bucks Bin laden could not succeed in a terror attack using US airliners? Maybe someone else on this elite crap game with US ties took that bet. Pulling strings the US president did nothing but stand out of the way. (US military planes were not dispatched to intercept the three planes tht altered their flight paths- an established procedure) Even worse the terrorists could be aided by the CIA, FBI, etc. The only thing left to do was cover their asses. I sometimes wonder if an evil spell made of extract of STUPID was cast over the american public.
Sorry. I too have been breathing chemtrail STUPID dusts. The previous post was in regard to the DARPA TERROR BETTING PARLORS.
On this GM food topic, I see Bushco saying that European governments objections amount to terrorists starving Africa.
I am reminded of the Percy Schmeiser case in Canada in which lawyer terrorists for big corporations attack a Non GMO neighbor using the wind as a carrier for their "Pollens of mass destruction".
Then accuse the victim of "STEALING" their DNA.
Hey, if this is all about humanitarian relief , why not make it the law that genetic engineering foods is a NON Profit venture.????
In the cyber world if someone attacks you with a virus you are a victim. If the GM world planners were hackers (which they are, now that I think about it) they would say that you have their patented virus on your computer and CHARGE you with staeling their virus. I well, that's how they get when someone has genetically modified their fat heads to be so incredibly stpid arsewholes.
sick world with all that..It will be worse but now i got to enjoy my life with real food as much as possible by my real growing own food etc.. ugh this s so emarassing with all the goverment people let goverment destory us..