December 21, 2003
Who captured Saddam Hussein?
Well, the cat is out of the bag so to speak. Saddam Hussein was captured by Kurds, not US forces. Here is the story as best I can determine by looking through a number of articles (see full list at end of this post).
Hussein was betrayed to the Kurds by a member of the al-Jabour tribe because Hussein's son Uday had raped a daughter of the tribe. Saddam had previously paid 7 million pounds in blood money to the tribe with the warning that he would wipe out the entire tribe if it ever came out. (Sify report)
He was then handed over to the Kurdish Patriotic Front who negotiated a deal with US forces for political power before drugging and abandoning Hussein for pickup. Ultimately he ended up in the hands of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) led by Jalal Talabani (Aljazeera)
Hussein could not escape the hole in which he was recovered because the entrance had been sealed.
The following is extracted from the article by Paul McGeogh from the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) We got him: Kurds say they caught Saddam.
Washington's claims that brilliant US intelligence work led to the capture of Saddam Hussein are being challenged by reports sourced in Iraq's Kurdish media claiming that its militia set the circumstances in which the US merely had to go to a farm identified by the Kurds to bag the fugitive former president.
The first media account of the December 13 arrest was aired by a Tehran-based news agency.
American forces took Saddam into custody around 8.30pm local time, but sat on the news until 3pm the next day.
However, in the early hours of Sunday, a Kurdish language wire service reported explicitly: "Saddam Hussein was captured by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. A special intelligence unit led by Qusrat Rasul Ali, a high-ranking member of the PUK, found Saddam Hussein in the city of Tikrit, his birthplace.
"Qusrat's team was accompanied by a group of US soldiers. Further details of the capture will emerge during the day; but the global Kurdish party is about to begin!"
The head of the PUK, Jalal Talabani, was in the Iranian capital en route to Europe.
The Western media in Baghdad were electrified by the Iranian agency's revelation, but as reports of the arrest built, they relied almost exclusively on accounts from US military and intelligence organisations, starting with the words of the US-appointed administrator of Iraq, Paul Bremer: "Ladies and gentlemen: we got 'im".
US officials said that they had extracted the vital piece of information on Saddam's whereabouts from one of the 20 suspects around 5.30pm on December 13 and had immediately assembled a 600-strong force to surround the farm on which he was captured at al-Dwar, south of Tikrit.
Little attention was paid to a line in Pentagon briefings that some of the Kurdish militia might have been in on what was described as a "joint operation"; or to a statement by Ahmed Chalabi, head of the Iraq National Congress, which said that Qusrat and his PUK forces had provided vital information and more.
What is truly interesting is not just the US claim of capturing Saddam Hussein, but the claiming of an elaborate operation that ended successfully (much like the scripting of the rescue of Jessica Lynch). Not only did that elaborate operation not work (if it existed at all), but the Kurds had him trapped in a hole while the US got the media apparatus together for the "dramatic" events.
What is also worrisome, but not unexpected, is the virtual silence of the US and British press. ABC News Online was the only US-based news I found, and it was a copy of the Agence French Press report.
News Sources Reporting the Story
I have put an * beside those reports offering the most detail
** We got him: Kurds say they caught Saddam, McGeogh, Sydney Morning Herald
** Saddam: Betrayed, drugged and traded Aljazeera
** Saddam was captured by Kurds, not US Sify.com
** Revealed: Who Really Found Saddam? Pratt, Sunday Herald/Scotland
Saddam held by Kurds, drugged and left for US troops: report ABC News Online
Kurds claim Saddam capture News.com.au (12/22/03)
Kurds Seized Saddam First, Novinite/Bulgaria
'Revenge for rape behind Saddam capture'
Report: ''Saddam capture - not result of American or British intelligence'' Al Bawaba.com
Saddam was held by Kurdish forces, drugged and left for US troops Arab Times/Kuwait
Kurds claim Saddam capture The Australian (12/22/03)
Kurds claim Saddam capture Herald Sun/AU (12/22/03)
Saddam was held by Kurds and left for US troops: ReportHindustan Times (copy of AFP report)
Saddam was held by Kurdish forces, drugged and left for US troops Channel News Asia (AFP report)
Kurds claim Saddam capture The Advertiser/AU (12/22/03)
** Kurds, Not U.S. Captured Saddam: Report Islam Online/UK
Saddam was held by Kurdish forces, drugged and left for US troops Kurdish Media (AFP report)
Saddam was held by Kurdish forces, drugged and left for US troops Infoshop News (AFP report)
Kurds, Not U.S. Captured Saddam: Report Palestinian Chronicle
** ‘Kurdish forces nabbed & drugged Saddam’ The Statesman/India
Kurds nabbed Saddam first? Today Online/Singapore (AFP report)
Saddam Captured by Kurds; US Troops Get Photo Opp Conspiracy Planet
Kurdish fighters 'drugged' tyrant Gulf Daily News/Bahrain
Saddam hld by Kurds, left for US troops Newind Press/ India
Saddam was held by Kurdish Forces, drugged and left for US troops China Daily/China
'Saddam was held by Kurdish forces, drugged and left for US troops' Daily Star/India (AFP report)
A report has surfaced which, if true, adds some missing details about how Saddam Hussein came to be in his "spider hole"... Morons.org
Saddam captured by Kurds (I'm really sure the North-American free press will report this any day now) Vive le Canada
The Saddam Hussein Capture, A Hoax? Rice, Al-Jazeera
Did Kurds Dupe Bush's Brass; or Did Bush Sell Out Iraqis to Kurds as Part of Saddam Handover Deal? Kall, OpEdNews
How was Saddam Really Captured: A Journalistic Review Sorenson, Republicons.org
Widespread Claims Kurds Got Saddam First Scoop
TruthOut link to AFP release
Village Voice link to AFP report
Posted by rowan at December 21, 2003 10:59 PM
| TrackBack
|
[eMail this article!] |
Social Net Options: DIGG this --
del.icio.us --
StumbleUpon
Wow! What a story! Why can't the mainstream media, AND the US government just be honest about this? I mean, are we so superficially egotistical that we have to stage a capture ala Jessica Lynch every single time? Ahhhh, but I hear a little knock at the door of US Policy whispering "gotta keep up the pretenses of world domination."
The story is pretty damning. I also posted this piece over at Correspondences.org and it must be getting a lot of hits. When I search google news for "Kurds Hussein" the link comes up at the top of the list. I am updating the piece as new sources come up. It will be interesting to see how widespread the report will have to get before it is picked up by the US corporate press.
Well, judging from the evident oblivion of 9/10ths of the public regarding the true story of Private Lynch, I've got to wonder if it will ever be conveyed accurately, and if it is, will the nipping of the sheep dogs continue to keep the flock from selecting their own way?
Red Flags go up as to what kind of "deal" the government may have negotiated with the Kurds, and all I keep feeling on a visceral level is a suspicion that the misdirection of resources in terms of the entire Iraqi escapade will be sanctified due to the capture of Hussein.
Insurgent attacks have barely faltered for a moment since his capture, and of course everyone here knew anyway that he isn't nearly our largest terrorist threat! But as long as shaggy images of this drugged-out former dictator get flashed across the media enough, everyone can get cozy in their safety just in time for Christmas, right?
My cynisism can barely be contained. Thank you so much, Rowan, for keeping the truth out there, and in one cohesive place, so we can remain informed!
Over at Correspondences someone commented "we got him so what difference does it make?" I think that may be a common feeling. They totally overlook the implications of creating a story and the inbed press going along, or the fact that some dela was struck and right now we don't know what it was.
Also lost in the whole mess is the effects of these kinds of lies. This story is spreading rapidly across Asia and the Middle East. It is in the Islamic, Kurdish, and Arabic press. It is out there for much of the rest of the world, but not the US. By shaping the US worldview through phony info, it leads those in the US to support policies that get us deeper and deeper into hot water.
Would people have been any less relieved if the Kurds got the credit for capture? No, and it would have gone a long way towards showing that Iraqi's can function without the US in the middle of everythin. Heck, it might have even built some good will toward the US. But, that wouldn't have "justified" US presence and Bush policy. It wouldn't have given Bush his poll "bump."
One of the problems with lying is that you have to lie to cover the lie until you have a house of lies that will fall down and bury you. However, if the Corporate press is willing to play the lie then most folks will never know they've been lied to. Unfortunately, ignorance is no excuse and the people of the US will be held responsible in global opinion for the actions of those who purportedly represent us.
Neither the capture of Hussein, nor the capture fabribrication makes us safer. While we may have Saddam Hussein, it is clear that al-Qaeda is not impressed. That is reflected by Ridge raising the threat level today.
My brother and I just discussed the "story" behind Hussein's capture resonating exactly what you've explained above, particularly noting that the capture of Hussein needed to be told as it happened, simple as that. The lies are cumulative. The lies are reflections of how important it is to our current government to be "on top." The lies indicate that America can't be trusted to report events accurately, and that we don't really care about world opinion, but do care about image on the home front.
What a myopic viewpoint! "We got him so what does it matter how?" Well, to me it's more than just a little bit important that the information released by my government isn't a bald-faced lie. If I'm being lied to about something that, as you stated, wouldn't have changed perspectives of the U.S. one iota, than what about issues that reflect poorly on us? Do we think we'll get the truth then?!?
And the world sentiment that you mentioned is something all Americans need to stand up and take note of, because as much as most U.S. citizens like to think we exist in a protective bubble, we don't. Freedom fries and American toast don't deny the existence of France.
It may seem miniscule to some (although I can't understand that way of thinking), but I think it's HUGE. I don't want to live in a Quiz Show world. Don't decide for me what reality is--present me with the facts and let me use my own brain matter to draw conclusions. I guess the current administration doesn't feel we have the right to this ... and worse yet, a good portion of society doesn't seem to want that option.
The more this stuff happens, the more I feel compelled to tell the truth in places and situations that may have seemed intimidating to me a few years ago. Thanks again, Rowan for the discourse!